A recent example that comes to mind are the Aloes. Some busybody taxonomists randomly decided to move some of my favorite species into their own genera. No real surprise here. It is a surprise though when a plant hobbyist deals with such drastic name changes with an abundance of equanimity...From Aloe to Aloiampelos, Aloidendron, Aristaloe, Gonialoe, Kumara. That's too much equanimity. I think he must have robbed an equanimity bank.
Being an open-minded guy though, I'm certainly willing to entertain the possibility that taxonomists aren't entirely useless. So I googled "why is taxonomy important" and found this...
Taxonomy is the field of research devoted to naming and describing living organisms - everything from bacteria and viruses to whales and flowers. It is an essential yet much underappreciated aspect of scientific research and without it huge branches of biology and other sciences would be near impossible. Taxonomists provide the basic vocabulary of biology if you like, defining each new species (individual words) and making sure there are accurate definitions of those species (like a dictionary) and records of those species, as DNA or actual specimens in museums so that everyone knows exactly which species is which and what other species it is related to. Without this kind of knowledge we cannot begin to do the simplest things with any degree of accuracy - if you do not know what species any given organism belongs to, then it becomes very hard to say anything meaningful about it. - Dr David Hone, Why taxonomy is importantHmmm...that kinda makes sense. In fact, I might actually be a taxonomist. Let me explain...
Don Boudreaux recently shared a link to this article...Slavery and Capitalism...by the Harvard historian Sven Beckert. When I got the gist of Beckert's argument, the first thing that popped into my mind was that he's a chanidget. "Chanidget" is a label that I created to refer to a person who believes that prosperity happens because of, rather than despite, government intervention. Of course the second thing that popped into my mind was that this designation obviously wasn't a good match. Beckert is arguing that prosperity happened because of, rather than despite, slavery. As far as I know, this doesn't have a label...which is an oversight that I feel a compulsion to correct. Isn't this exactly what taxonomists do?
So it seems that I am a taxonomist...but not of biology. Rather, I'm a taxonomist of economic ignorance.